TIMOTHY LEARY HOW TO OPERATE YOUR MIND

[nytt namn]

Hoppa till exakt 7:00, Leary börjar prata om Sokrates och Filosofi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r68YfwR7Qc

[Anna Sara]

Improper manifestation of the energy:

Jupiter rules “overgrowth” and “overexpansiveness.”4 In biology, the cancerous proliferation of cells that widen their “sphere of influence” without regard for the final consequence of such growth corresponds to the negative manifestation of an overactive Jupiter. Jupiter also rules the principle of psychological inflation or hubris. The latter will manifest as brash, inelegant, showy displays of wealth, resources, or social connections, all of which highlights one’s ever-widening sphere of power and influence, rather than serving to broaden one’s social consciousness or enhancing self-actualization through the integration of higher levels of yin awareness.
       When someone is inflated by the principle of “growth and expansion,” relationships will be viewed as “acquisitions” or as a means of using others as sounding boards off which one resonates one’s “booming” Jupiterian presence. By “ego-identifying” with Jupiter and by hubristically acting out such pat terns, the human experience of Jupiter–as a function that enables us to expand the breadth of the soul (and the breadth of our social role and knowl edge)–is replaced by mere overindulgence and excess. A classic example of this is the boastful, self-indulgent epicurean, who is rich in some material way, enjoying every conceivable sensual extrava gance, and yet who is utterly impoverished internally.
       Those who have not actualized Jupiter in a conscious manner will find themselves projectively enmeshed in unconscious attractions to those who embody such Jupiterian principles and symbols. An unintegrated Jupiter may result in a subliminal yearning to expand a region of the soul where the native senses a developmental gap in insight or awareness. When such yearning is psychologically projected, this may involve attachments to those who seem to have already integrated such classic Jupiter qualities (i.e., uninhibited growth; “dilating” soul experience; the broadening of soul by per forming a role that mirrors an essential social value). But the unintegrated Jupiter native can fall prey to becoming a mere “acquisition” of the Jupiter-identified person, who hooks the bait by at first seeming to freely dispense with some of Jupiter’s largesse only to eventually claim possession over a person’s soul, because they are now “indebted” to the dispenser of material wealth (e.g., the patron who displays a patronizing attitude); the provider of spiritual knowledge (e.g., the cult leader who infantilizes his followers); or the promoter of feel-good experi ences that the native feels incapable of providing for himself.
       Another improper Jupiter expression is exhibited in the personal identification with the puer aeternus or “eternal youth”: a Peter Pan who shuns all limitation and who seeks to express the limitless, ever-widening poten tial for unrestrained experience (in particular, the expression of joyful, soulful expansiveness). This figure is diametrically opposed to the archetypal senex: an authoritarian figure who espouses laws of social restraint, disci pline, and measure, and the imposition of duty and responsibility–especially as a counter measure to this impulsive expression of unrestrained freedom of soul. (This was aptly symbolized by Blake’s “horses of instruction” (Saturn), which was opposed to his (Jupiterian) notion of the “tygers of wrath.”) By fearing the Saturnian “reality” principle, the Jupiterian puer aeternus suffers the fate of losing touch with Saturn’s earth-bound wisdom, which, when properly understood and expressed, provides us with greater free dom of movement through the material realm.
       If he is overidentified with Jupiter’s urge for an unrestrained expression of the soul, the puer will eventually be crushed by Saturn’s demand to face the material realm and its limits. This will be enacted through an unconscious attraction to senex figures (those sober “horses of instruc tion”): upholders of the “law,” such as police or other disciplinary forces, who formally “arrest” the puer (who is already imprisoned by his “arrested development”). Another likely scenario for the puer (especially in the more introverted subject who seeks “wisdom” rather than material largesse) is manifested in his tendency to ignore the demands of the body (the acquisition of food, shelter, clothing etc.) until a point of a hazardous “awakening” is reached. Until this happens, however, the puer may be viewed as a charming, delightful figure: one who possesses the ability to evoke an unlimited cornucopia of soulful experience.
       While the unintegrated Jupiter native may become possessed by an inner puer figure, it is also possible that he will personify the senex in a puer’s life, providing him with food, shelter, lodgings, and the surrogate acting out of those duties and responsibilities that represent the essential components of human life. Instead of fall ing into the trap of becoming a surrogate senex for an irresponsible puer, those with an unintegrated Jupiter complex need to rekindle an awareness of the positive aspect of the puer archetype: in its positive expression, the puer is the newly reborn soul (hence, his youthful appearance, his symbols of expansiveness and growth, and his focus on experi ence that is soulfully enriching).
       The puer is in danger of overidentify ing with (or unwittingly personifying) collective soul issues to the detriment of his per sonal soul development. By promulgating philosophic, artistic, or religious doctrines (Jupiter), the puer is often avoiding his personal issues of emotional well-being (Moon) or his potential for mature interpersonal feelings of intimacy (Venus). In this manner, he is overstepping early devel opmental yin stages (Moon and Venus) in favor of a later stage of yin development (Jupi ter). Without a secure emotional foundation (Moon), or an appropriate means of expressing feelings to others (Venus), issues concerning the larger collec tive soul (Jupiter) cannot be properly addressed or experienced in an appropriate manner.
       The puer is therefore imagined as a winged figure who can fly, as in the “Peter Pan” story (i.e., his insights are not grounded in real human experience; he is not “down to earth”). In psychological literature, we see that puers often dream of flying or of hovering dangerously high above the ground. Lacking an emotional connection (Moon) or a means of expressing feeling-toned intimacy (Venus) with others, the pathetic figure of the puer has no other recourse than to personalize (Moon) and romanticize (Venus) his relationship to the artistic, philosophical, or cultural heritage of mankind (Jupiter). Such an inflated consciousness has no real place on the human plane: therefore, it floats up, into the ether of a groundless “philosophy,” where the puer may feel comfort able in preaching to all and sundry–in his wonderfully detached and expansive manner–until the time comes when this detachment from the more personal drama will exact a very personal price.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign

VIVA!



Allting kommer alltid handla om DET HÄR.

...

Båda partner kontrollerar varandra för att sluta kontrollera varandra och detta förutsätter ett "spel", inte sant?


Vi strävar evolutionärt efter kontroll men samtidigt är total kontroll något vulgärt, det vittnar om "rädsla" och "väljs bort"... Vi kräver det som "varit där", som kräver något "totalt". Det vi ordlöst strävar efter är mötet med "mystik" för detta är för rent för att identifiera sig med -intensitetens jag, att försöka identifiera sig med det är att identifiera sig men det är samtidigt ingen identitet. Mystik är enkelt det helt okontrollerade. Men.. Att uppleva "mystiken" är att vara i total kontroll -att "totalt kontrollera" en annan människa är allt det som inte är mystiskt men detta inger mystiken i den "omedvetet" kontrollerade vilket "föder tiden" och vice versa är den tredimensionella syntesen "Gud".....

Intet + varandet är transcendensens "klimat".. (där allt "ingen" tar/tagit ansvar för projiceras) -vårt SAMVETE poängterar alltså gudomligheten.



Språket är något patetiskt.




Vattumän( new age) kan generaliseras som en "psykotiska wannabes" i sitt sökandes "obalanserade" självprojiceringar, i rädslan för att förlora stagnering. Men dem får inte inte stanna! I dagens förvirring och intensitet förstärks rollen och ev. psykos för att föras hem till den ensamma känslan, men det är lite av en livslögn. Utvecklingsfasen uttrycks i den motsatta polariten av arketypen, "den psykotiska wannaben" eller svårtydda "intelligenta" samhällsmedborgaren, vilket i vissa fall kan skapa ett groteskt uttryck i en privat desperation till det perverterade och det "eftersökt unika". Inom mognaden (i det ensamma hjärtats förälskelse till mänskligheten) behövs självreflektion, lugn och balanserad anpassning i en futuristisk sorts kärlek till jämlikarna, som bygger upp personligheten i en stund av till det fragila mänskliga behovet chockar dessa "slöa" själar och värdsligt bryter upp människans frihet, där deras individuella ansvar över det unika kommer tillbaka till nuet, tjänande något andra såg. Det kan i vissa fall vara extremt känsligt.






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo3KEQrV ... re=related